|
CONTENTS
HIGHLIGHTS
Spring, 2000
Series A, Number 10 Credits This report was prepared by Vera M. Zlidar. Bryant Robey, Editor. Stephen M. Goldstein, Managing Editor. Vera M. Zlidar, Research Analyst. Design by Linda D. Sadler. Production by John R. Fiege, Merridy Gottlieb, Peter Hammerer, and Deborah Maenner. The assistance of the following reviewers is appreciated: Marcia Angle, Luis Bahamondes, Debora Bossemeyer, John Guillebaud, Ricky Lu, Emma Ottolenghi, Herbert Peterson, Tsigue Pleah, Linda Potter, Malcolm Potts, Joedo Prihartono, Roberto Rivera, Michael Rosenberg, Lois A. Schaefer, Elizabeth Schoenecker, James Shelton, J. Joseph Speidel, and James Trussell. Suggested citation: Zlidar, V.M. Helping Women Use the Pill. Population Reports, Series A, No. 10. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Population Information Program, Summer 2000.
Center for Communication Porgrams The Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health Phyllis Tilson Piotrow, Ph.d., Director, Center for Communication Programs and Principal Investigator, Population Information Program Ward Rinehart, Project Director, Population Information Program Anne W. Compton, Deputy Director, Population Information Program, and Chief, POPLINE computerized bibliographic services Hugh M. Rigby, Associate Director, Population Information Program, and Chief, Media/Materials Clearinghouse Jose G. Rimon II, Deputy Director, Center for Communication Programs and Project Director, Population Communication Services, developing family planning communication strategies, projects, training, and materials Population Reports (USPS 063–150) is published four times a year (spring, summer, fal, winter) at 111 Market Place, Suite 310, Baltimore, Maryland 21202, USA, by the Population Information Program of the Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health. Periodicals postage paid at Baltimore, Maryland, and other locations. Postmaster to send address changes to Population Reports, Population Information Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, 111 Market Place, Suite 310, Baltimore, Maryland 21202, USA. Population Reports is designed to provide an accurate and authoritative overview of important developments in the population field.
Published with support from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Global, G/PHN/POP/CMT, under the terms of Grant No. HRN-A-00-97-00009-00. The opinions expressed herein |
Helping Women Use the Pill Around the world over 100 million women rely on oral contraceptives (OCs). They benefit from the effectiveness, safety, and convenience of the pill. Still, many women do not use the pill as successfully as possible. Programs can help women use OCs effectively. When taken properly, the pill is a highly effective contraceptive. Oral contraceptives are unique among family planning methods, however: Their full effectiveness requires the user's daily action. In part because some women have trouble taking the pill correctly, pregnancy rates are usually much higher than if the pill were used perfectly. For combined OCs the perfect-use pregnancy rate is estimated at only 0.1 per 100 women in the first 12 months of use. In actual use pregnancy rates range from 1.7 to 10.5 pregnancies per 100 women in the first 12 months in 21 surveyed countries. Better pill use would make a big difference. Based on worldwide levels of pill use in 2000, for example, over 2 million women become pregnant unintentionally each year because they do not take the pill effectively. Also, women would be healthier, and medical costs would be less, since complications of pregnancy, childbirth, and unsafe abortion are among the leading causes of women's ill health and death in developing countries. Encouraging more effective OC use requires understanding problems with pill-taking. OC users make a variety of mistakes. These include missing pills, taking “rests” from pill use, starting the next pill pack too late, and taking pills out of sequence. Research suggests that most pregnancies during pill use result from increasing the number of days between pill packets that hormonal pills are not taken. Errors sometimes occur because women are not told how to use the pill, or they receive incorrect advice. Some users do not understand or remember instructions. Some pill users who become pregnant report vomiting or diarrhea and/or use of antibiotics around the time of conception. It is not clear what role these events play in pill failure.
What Can Be Done?Using mass media. Radio, television, and other mass media can inform potential users, users, and their partners about the pill and other methods. The mass media often start people thinking about family planning and contraceptives. They also can remind continuing users about effective pill use and help to counter false rumors about the pill. Counseling. Counseling—face-to-face dialogue between client and provider—improves OC use. Women who receive good counseling are more likely to continue using the pill and to use it effectively. In particular, women need to know about the common side effects before they start the pill. Counseling is especially helpful both when a client is deciding about the pill and if she experiences side effects in the first months of use. Providers counsel better when trained and enabled to use both knowledge of family planning and communication skills. New guidelines, new attitudes. Family planning programs help clients use OCs more successfully when they update guidelines and procedures to reflect new scientific understanding about OCs. Unnecessary legal, medical, or other institutional barriers sometimes impede pill use. Such barriers include baseless eligibility restrictions, unnecessary screening procedures, and legal, programmatic, and provider bias against certain family planning methods or groups of clients. By adopting guidelines, procedures, and attitudes that respond, first and foremost, to clients' needs and wishes, family planning programs can help pill users find more satisfaction and more value in their contraceptive method. Improving access. Making it easier to obtain OCs helps women use them correctly without interruption. Ensuring regular supplies, making pills affordable, and offering them conveniently all are important. Without good access, women may discontinue, take pills inconsistently, or switch to less effective methods. Convenient clinics, community-based distribution, social marketing, links with other health services, and good supply chains can make it easier for women to use the pill.
Using Oral Contraceptives Particularly because so many couples rely on the pill, ensuring its effective use is important to fulfilling people's reproductive goals. OCs are unique among contraceptives in that their full effectiveness requires the user's daily action. No other method requires the user to act on a daily basis, even when no sexual contact takes place. When taken consistently and correctly, OCs are one of the most effective methods. In actual use, however, OCs are not as effective at preventing pregnancy as they could be. If family planning programs and health care providers paid greater attention to helping women use the pill, the actual effectiveness of OCs could improve substantially. Strategies to improve pill use include giving women complete and easily understood information, providing individual counseling, and offering frequent follow-up messages to remind women about effective pill use. Mass media campaigns that inform people about family planning can foster social approval of it and educate people about available methods. Making pills accessible and removing any unnecessary restrictions to their safe use also can help women use the pill more effectively.
OC Pregnancy RatesFor combined OCs, which contain both progestin and estrogen, the perfect-use pregnancy rate is estimated at just one pregnancy per 1,000 women, or 0.1 per 100, in the first 12 months of use. For the progestin-only pill, the perfect-use pregnancy rate is estimated at five pregnancies per 1000 women, or 0.5 per 100, in the first 12 months of use (223). Typical-use pregnancy rates for OCs* are generally much higher. National surveys in 21 countries found that typical-use pregnancy rates among OC users ranged from 1.7 pregnancies per 100 women in Bangladesh to 10.5 per 100 women in Bolivia in the first 12 months of use (see Figure 1). In the US the pregnancy rate among OC users in 1995 was 6.9 per 100 women over 12 months (225). Longer-term users of OCs tend to be more effective users, possibly both because of experience and because less successful users have become pregnant, discontinued use, or switched to a different method. In five of seven countries with data for 24 months of pill use, pregnancy rates were lower in the second year than in the first year (4, 225). Over two years, rates ranged from 4.5 pregnancies per 100 OC users in Thailand to 16.5 pregnancies per 100 OC users in Egypt (4). | While some typical one-year pregnancy rates may seem modest, even low levels of contraceptive failure each year can mean that over the long term many women will have unintended pregnancies. If the pregnancy rate for the pill is 6% per year among a group of pill users, for example, nearly half would experience unintended pregnancy within 10 years (184). Over 18% of users would become pregnant after 10 years at a 2% pregnancy rate per year, while an annual pregnancy rate of 10% would result in 65% of users experiencing unintended pregnancy over 10 years. Based on estimates of worldwide pill use for 2000, in one year at least 2 million women become pregnant unintentionally because they do not take the pill effectively (see side-bar, Most Pill Users' Pregnancies Occur When They Quit but Do Not Switch). If even just 1 more woman in every 10 used OCs effectively, there would be 200,000 fewer unintended pregnancies. As typically used, the pill is less effective in preventing pregnancy than such other reversible methods as intrauterine devices (IUDs) and injectables. Yet, if used perfectly, the pill would be among the most effective methods—slightly more effective than the copper T IUD, progestin-only injectable contraceptives, and female sterilization. In fact, only Norplant implants have an expected perfect-use failure rate lower than that of combined OCs (223).
*Unless noted otherwise, the term "OCs" as used in this report indicates combined oral contraceptives. Most studies of typical use, however, do not specify whether rates are for progestin-only pills, combined OCs, or both. Since most pill users take combined OCs, it can be assumed that these data largely reflect rates for combined pills.
Common Problems with Using the PillPill-taking mistakes are not unique to OC users. Research on medication-taking habits for a number of illnesses—from epilepsy to asthma—indicates that 10% to 20% of patients have trouble taking correct doses, whether they underuse, overuse, or use their medications inconsistently (146). Common problems with OC use include missing pills, taking "rests" from pill use, running out of pills, incorrectly switching from one pill packet to the next and so extending the amount of time without taking hormonal tablets, and taking pills out of sequence. Family planning programs can address many of these problems. Missing pills. Many women may miss a few pills in a packet and not take corrective action. Sometimes women simply forget to take a pill now and then. Some women may miss a few pills because their supply runs out or because they leave their pills at home when they travel. Women may skip pills because they are experiencing side effects, such as nausea or spotting, and think—mistakenly—that skipping a few pills will reduce these side effects. Missing a pill now and then seldom leads to pregnancy (see side-bar, Missed Pills and Pregnancy: When are Women Most at Risk?). Frequently missing a number of pills, however, increases a woman's chances of becoming pregnant. Furthermore, missing pills in each pack without becoming pregnant can be self-reinforcing. Some women who miss pills may begin to think that their irregular pill-taking pattern is good enough to avoid pregnancy and thus continue taking the pill haphazardly (129, 165). Eventually, some women will lose this gamble. A study in Western Europe, for example, found that women who usually missed one or more pills from each packet were nearly three times more likely to become pregnant than women who reported not missing any pills (182). Although missing pills increases a woman's risk of unintended pregnancy, women who do not use the pill perfectly still have a lower overall risk of pregnancy than women who use no contraception at all. In a US study only 13% of pill users took their pills correctly over a period of 6 to 12 months. Nevertheless, the pill users overall experienced only one-third the rate of pregnancy that occurred among women who had obtained pills but did not use them at all (148). Women can benefit from instructions on how to make up missed pills. Women who miss one pill should take the missed pill as soon as they remember. Women missing two or more pills can protect themselves from pregnancy by following the "seven-day" guideline (see side-bar, Using the "Seven-day" Guide Line to Make Up Missed Pills). Few studies have looked at what corrective action women take when they miss pills. A 1997 study of 103 US women's pill-use habits over three cycles found that 52% did not miss more than one pill. Among women missing more than one pill, some 18% avoided intercourse for a week thereafter, while 3% used a back-up method for seven days after missing pills. Either abstinence or a back-up method would be effective if kept up until a woman had taken hormonal pills for seven days straight. Some 27%, however, did not take any protective action after missing multiple pills (147). Taking "rests" from pill use. Sometimes women stop taking their pills temporarily. Some health care providers incorrectly advise pill users that they need to give their bodies a "rest period" from the pill. For example, a 1993 study in Jamaica found that two-thirds of private providers recommended a rest from pill use in order to "expel" chemicals from the body (80). Many women also believe that they need to give their bodies a rest from the pill. In an Egyptian study 13% of self-identified pill users who had no pills on hand when interviewed said that they were resting from the pill hormones. Nearly 20% of women with pill packets at home at the time of interview reported not taking a pill in the last eight or more days because they were resting from the method (129). In Australia some 27% of OC users interviewed reported taking a rest from pill use at some time (237). Resting from the pill is a common practice around the world, and yet there is no scientific justification for it. There is no accumulation of hormones in the body when taking OCs (55, 220). Nor are there any known health or fertility benefits to taking periodic rests. In contrast, the risks can be considerable. In one study 25% of women who took such rests from pill use became pregnant unintentionally (75). Making transition errors. Some pill users do not begin a new pill packet at the right time (94, 123, 164, 212). Making this kind of mistake—a transition error—is common. In Bangladesh, for example, although most women correctly answered questions about how to take pills and how to make up for missed pills, only 37% of rural users and 24% of urban users knew when to begin their next 28-day packet (123). The 28-day pill packets allow users to take a pill every day, rather than having to count seven pill-free days before starting a new 21-day packet. It would seem that taking a pill every day would be easier to remember than counting days between cycles. Nevertheless, a study in Egypt found that users of 21- and 28-day packets made transition errors equally often (94). Some women incorrectly wait for a withdrawal bleed, which they perceive as menstruation, before starting the next pill packet. In Bangladesh, for example, 47% of rural woman and 59% of urban women surveyed said that they waited for evidence of menstruation between pill packets (123). Women with misperceptions about the pill—in particular, the incorrect idea that OCs can cause infertility (1, 150)—may wait for what they think is a menstrual period as evidence that the pill has not affected their ability to have children (100). This misperception can extend the interval between pill packets. The correct practice is to start the next cycle of pills on schedule—no later than seven days after the last hormonal tablet—regardless of when withdrawal bleeding does or does not occur. Taking pills out of sequence. Some women do not take their pills in the correct order. Rather than follow the arrows on the packet that indicate which pill to take next, some women take pills in random order or follow the rows in a different direction. A study in Egypt found that 24% of women who could show the interviewer their pill packets had taken pills out of sequence, while in Indonesia 5% had made this mistake (94). With 28-pill packets, taking pills out of sequence can result in taking placebo pills at the wrong time in the pill cycle, increasing the risk of pregnancy.
Who Uses Pills Incorrectly?Level of education, household income, and other social factors can strongly predict effective pill use in one country but not in another (33, 94, 123, 139). In Egypt, for example, a study observed that inability to read was a good predictor of improper pill use. In Botswana and Zimbabwe, however, the same study could not identify any set of indicators that consistently identified women who use the pill incorrectly (94). Some studies have found that younger women—adolescents, in particular—are less likely than older users to take the pill correctly (89, 94, 163). Other studies, however, have found no consistent association between age and proper OC use. Age often acts as a surrogate for other factors that influence pill use, such as education, motivation, side effects, and the client's perception of the quality of the provider-client interaction (178, 182). Motivation to avoid pregnancy is important to effective pill use. Women who are sure that they do not want any more children typically are more effective pill users than women who do not currently desire pregnancy but who want more children in the future. In the Philippines, for example, older women, women with many children, and women using contraception to limit rather than space births had the lowest rates of pregnancy among all pill users (153).
Consequences of Pill FailureFor many women throughout the world, effectively using family planning can save not only their own lives but also their children's. The one million or more children who are left motherless each year due to maternal mortality are 3 to 10 times more likely to die within two years than children who live with both parents (229). Some women who become pregnant while taking the pill have abortions. In England 17% of abortion-seekers were using the pill when they became pregnant (173). In Australia a survey of over 2,000 women who had abortions in 1992 found that 14% were using the pill when they conceived (235). Where abortion is unsafe, its consequences include nearly 80,000 maternal deaths annually and hundreds of thousands of disabilities. In fact, in some countries complications of unsafe abortion causes more maternal deaths than any other single factor (243). More effective pill use can avert much morbidity and mortality among women of reproductive age.
Continuation and Switching If the percentage of women who stopped pill use without switching to another method while still in need of contraception was reduced by one percentage point, 620,000 unintended pregnancies could be avoided each year.
ContinuationOral contraceptive continuation rates differ greatly among countries and programs. In 8 of 10 countries with available survey data, about two-thirds or fewer pill users continued OC use for 12 months or more, and half or fewer continued to use the pill for at least two years (see Figure 3). By comparison, in 7 of 9 countries with comparable data, two-thirds or more of IUD users continued using the IUD after two years (4, 58, 139, 153, 225). Family planning programs often can help more women achieve their reproductive intentions if they focus on serving women already using a method rather than only on attracting new users (102). As contraceptive use becomes more widespread, continuing users increasingly outnumber potential new users. For example, in the US, only an estimated one-fifth of nearly 19 million pill users in one year had started the pill that year (181). Short-term versus long-term use. Some women use OCs for only a short time—an average of four to six months (62, 177). Short-term users are most likely to discontinue because of side effects such as nausea, breakthrough bleeding, spotting, weight gain, and breast tenderness (124, 139, 180, 182, 192, 193, 227). Although a substantial group of OC users quit within a few months, many other women are long-term OC users. Data that include short-term as well as long-term users demonstrate that many women rely on the pill for the long term. For example, in the mid-1990s median duration of pill use was 18 months in the Philippines (153) and 27 months in Indonesia (58). In Zimbabwe, where most family planning users rely on the pill, the median length of OC use was 28 months (186). A 1995 Canadian survey found that the average length of pill use was seven years, and that, among pill users over age 35, nearly 70% had used the pill for more than 10 years (17).
Side EffectsInconsistent pill use. How consistently women take the pill can affect the incidence of side effects. Missing pills or taking pills late can increase the occurrence of nausea, vomiting, spotting, and breakthrough bleeding (37, 124, 163, 179). In fact, using the pill inconsistently can create a self-defeating sequence of events. For example, a woman misses a pill, causing spotting or breakthrough bleeding. She may take two pills the next day to make up for the missed pill, but this brings on nausea and perhaps vomiting. Because of these problems, she skips more pills—mistakenly thinking the break will alleviate her side effects—and so experiences more side effects. This chain of events can soon lead her to stop pill use altogether. Many women discontinue the pill because they were not informed when they started that it can cause side effects (180, 235). When side effects are unexpected, they can be frightening. Telling pill users ahead of time about the possible common side effects and how inconsistent use can aggravate side effects are among the most important messages about pill use that providers can convey (see Chapter 4.2). Breakthrough bleeding and spotting. For many women pill use makes periods more regular and reduces blood loss. Breakthrough bleeding and spotting, however, occur in some users and affect pill use, particularly when women do not understand why they are bleeding. Some women mistakenly think that irregular bleeding indicates a serious health problem, such as cancer (88, 166), and so they may stop taking the pill. Covert pill users—that is, women using the pill without their partners' knowledge—fear that breakthrough bleeding will reveal their contraceptive use to their partners and families. Changes in menstrual patterns, irregular bleeding, and amenorrhea are a primary concern and often the main reason for discontinuation among covert pill users (22). Islamic women, for example, cannot pray while menstruating. Not attending prayers for weeks at a time could alert husbands and members of the extended family to covert contraceptive use (22). In cultures where women's activities are restricted during menstruation, breakthrough bleeding amounts to far more than dealing with an unpleasant or frightening side effect. Women's participation in food preparation, religious rituals, community events, school attendance—in general, their mobility—is severely constrained while they are menstruating (13, 134). For example, some women in India cannot touch their children during menstruation, while others are forced to sleep away from their families (77). Prolonged or frequent bleeding episodes that limit women's everyday activities can contribute considerably to discontinuation of OC use.
The Contraceptive Coverage GapThis gap in contraceptive coverage leads to many pregnancies, since women quickly regain their fertility after discontinuing pill use. In Ghana, for example, 53% of women who stopped coming to a health facility for OCs became pregnant within four months. Of the women who waited more than four months to return, 75% became pregnant. Nearly 40% reported these pregnancies as unintended (227).
Switching MethodsAmong women in the Philippines who stopped using the pill, one-fourth switched to a traditional family planning method, yet none of these women wanted another pregnancy (153). Similarly, in Bangladesh 12% of pill users switching methods or discontinuing use changed to a traditional method (139). Women who switch from OCs to long-term or permanent methods, of course, experience far fewer unintended pregnancies than women who switch to less effective methods. For example, of nearly 880,000 pill users in the US estimated to switch from the pill to an IUD or sterilization, about 11,000 would experience unintended pregnancy (181). Pill users often switch to the IUD, implants, or sterilization once they have had all the children they want. In Finland, for example, the pill is the most common method used by women who have no children. The IUD is used almost exclusively by women who have had at least one child, while sterilization becomes more common among contraceptive users as they have more children (117). In Sri Lanka more than twice as many pill users over 30 years old switched from the pill to sterilization than did women under age 30 (109). Many women who stop using the pill choose the pill again later. In Ghana, among women who had discontinued pill use and later returned to the same health facility to use family planning again, half chose the pill again (227). In Peru some 30% of women who stopped using the pill of their own accord started using it again within a year (119). A study in the US found that, one month after stopping pill use, 65% of women began using contraception again. Of these, over one-fifth were again using the pill. One year after discontinuing use, 80% had resumed contraception, and again one-fifth were taking the pill (225).
How Mass Media Can Help Conversely, receiving less information and counseling about the pill results in poorer pill use. In a European study of over 6,500 current and past OC users, those who said they did not receive enough information about the pill nor enough help from their providers were one and one-half times more likely to miss one or more pills per cycle than women who felt they received adequate information and counseling (182). Accurate knowledge is the key to making good decisions about one's reproductive health. Studies show that many women are able to make decisions as well as their providers do, as long as they are given and understand the necessary information (29, 250). While counseling is valuable, a single counseling session with a family planning provider usually cannot cover all of the information that a person needs to make an informed choice among family planning methods. Nor should counselors and other front-line health care providers have to bear all the responsibility for seeing that clients are fully informed. One way to inform pill users, potential users, and their partners about family planning is through the mass media, including radio, TV, video, and newspapers (157). Mass media bring family planning to people's attention even before they meet a provider and often start the decision-making process that leads people to seek family planning services (158). Because the mass media also reach continuing family planning users, they can provide important reminders about pill use.
People obtain much of their information about the pill from the mass media, even though the information is not necessarily designed to aid contraceptive choice and use. In Nigeria, for example, among 500 female university students surveyed, 40% received information about the pill from newspapers or magazines, 28% from television, and 26% from radio. Some 44% reported getting pill information from their peers, 42% from providers, and 30% from nurses (1). Typically, however, information in the mass media is not detailed enough to help people choose a specific family planning method and use it effectively. Because the mass media reach large and diverse audiences, family planning programs can use the media to improve the use of OCs and other contraceptive methods. In Nepal, for example, the Ministry of Health has used mass media to educate radio listeners about different contraceptives and their use. The radio drama, Cut Your Coat According to Your Cloth, airs four times a week and has been broadcast since 1995. This program gives detailed information on how OCs and other methods work, their advantages and disadvantages, and their proper use (104, 105). The mass media can reach family planning providers as well as the public. Providers can keep up to date with advances in family planning through mass media distance education courses. In Nepal a weekly distance education course for health workers, Service Brings Reward, complements the radio drama for family planning users and has helped to improve the quality of provider-client interaction (104, 106, 214).
Communicating Well
The program advises interested listeners to see a health worker for further information and counseling (105). The drama has a strong positive effect on listeners' perceptions of and behavior toward family planning (214). The pill is not the best method for everyone. The mass media need to inform people about the existing range of contraceptive choices. The more family planning options available—and the better the range of choices is known—the better each person can find the method she or he can use with satisfaction. The result will be that every contraceptive method, OCs included, will be used more effectively. Repeat to reinforce. Repeating a message reinforces it. In a study in the Netherlands, even new pill users who at first had the best use practices began missing more pills by their third pill cycle. These women said that they referred to their audiotaped pill use instructions far less by the third cycle than at first (40). Another study on consistent pill use found women missed more pills with each subsequent pack over three months (147). One implication of more pills being missed over time is that women may need repeated messages about effective pill use. Another is that, rather than depend solely on instructions that users must seek out, messages also need to reach people frequently and easily, as on radio and TV. The mass media can reinforce messages on effective use in a variety of ways to maintain interest. For example, a character in a radio drama can be depicted taking her daily pill in response to a cue that reminds her. At the same time, short spots can remind listeners: "Have you taken your pill today?" Portraying the pill accurately. How the mass media portray OCs to the public—be it accurately or inaccurately—strongly affects women's perceptions and use of the pill. Negative portrayals in the news have caused widespread concerns over the safety of OCs and have contributed to irregular use and discontinuation (88, 235). For example, in the UK and other European countries the mass media gave extensive publicity to reports in the mid-1990s about some types of OCs and risks of cardiovascular disease—reports whose validity continues to be debated. The publicity created a pill scare. Many women switched to other OCs or stopped taking pills altogether. One provider of legal abortions in the UK reported that 61% of women seeking abortions said they had quit taking pills in mid-pack as a result of the media coverage (43, 76). In the months following, the number of unintended pregnancies and abortions increased substantially (9, 26, 27, 101, 171, 242). Involving men. In most of the world men have greater access to the mass media than women do, and so family planning messages in the mass media may reach men even more than women (238, 239). Often men greatly influence their partners' family planning behavior and can help them use the pill more effectively (see side-bar, Men Can Help).
Counseling About the Pill Personal interaction between client and provider is the key to good counseling. To counsel women effectively, providers themselves need to know a lot about the pill, to have good interpersonal communication skills, and to work in an environment that promotes good-quality interaction and supports follow-up with clients. When family planning providers have the skills, resources, and support to be good counselors, clients make better informed decisions, use methods more effectively and longer, and make more appropriate changes among methods.
What Is Good Counseling?GATHER, a six-step process, can help service providers counsel family planning clients. The letters in the word GATHER stand for Greet-Ask-Tell-Help-Explain-Return. Each step of the GATHER process covers a different element of counseling and helps guide provider-client interaction. Following these steps helps clients to make informed decisions about their family planning options (175). GATHER has been translated into at least 10 languages and adopted by training programs around the world (103). (See Population Reports, GATHER Guide to Counseling, Series J, No. 48, December 1998.) Counseling often can help the client both choose and use a method. Most clients already have a method in mind when they meet with a provider. In this case, the provider's responsibility is to make sure that the client's choice is based on accurate understanding of the method and awareness of other options. The provider can help the client consider whether the method she prefers suits her own needs and situation. Since in some places OCs are better known than other methods—almost synonymous with family planning itself—counselors may need to check especially that clients who ask for OCs are aware of other options. Also, the provider needs to check whether the client has any medical condition that would rule out use of the client's preferred method (see checklist). Once the client confirms her choice, the provider's responsibility is to help her use her method effectively and with satisfaction. If a woman chooses OCs, the provider discusses how to take the pill, what to do if one or more pills are missed, what to do if common side effects occur, when and how to use back-up methods, and what symptoms indicate a need to seek immediate care from a doctor or nurse. At the first meeting the provider needs to assure that the client's understanding of the pill is accurate (111, 235). It usually is difficult to correct misperceptions about a contraceptive method after the client has started using it (20). Thus the first meeting should convey key messages about effective pill use (see side-bar, Key Counseling Messages About the Pill). Women who receive good counseling are less likely to discontinue using the pill. In Colombia, for example, a study found that women who rated their health promoter "very effective" at communication were more likely than other women to continue using the pill (62). Other research shows that a client's perception of the quality of interaction with a provider is consistently among the most important factors in effective pill use (176).
Addressing Common Side EffectsFor example, in Bukidnon Province, the Philippines, women who were counseled about potential OC side effects and who rated their provider as friendly were less likely to stop using the pill than women who did not receive such counseling. Based on these findings, provider training in the Philippines now emphasizes friendly interaction and explaining common side effects (191, 196). Despite such findings, other studies show that many OC clients know little about the possibility of side effects and how to manage them. Studies in 10 sub-Saharan African countries, for example, found that only 25% to 54% of family planning users were informed about side effects during counseling. Even fewer received information on managing common side effects—from just 1% in Côte d'Ivoire to 42% in Burkina Faso, among the five countries with data (138). Explanations that women can understand help them continue to use the pill until the side effects subside. A Nepal program puts side effects in a familiar context by comparing them to changes that occur during pregnancy: "Just as a woman's body changes when she is pregnant, so changes can occur when she prevents pregnancy. But these changes are not dangerous" (105).
TrainingTraining can help a wide range of pill providers, including clinic staff, pharmacists, social marketing agents, and community-based health workers. In Gujarat, India, for example, gynecologists, general practitioners, and pediatricians who had special training about the pill improved their counseling skills. Trained providers, when compared with others who had not received the special training, were more likely to show clients how to use the pill and to provide a pill packet at the counseling session. In turn, clients' perception of the quality of care improved. In a study using "mystery clients"—local women who visited clinics posing as clients—satisfaction with counseling averaged 83% for the specially trained doctors compared with 56% for doctors without the training (204). On-the-job training during working hours often can help providers apply their new skills more effectively than formal off-site training because trainees develop skills within the work environment (215). In Kenya trainers noted that providers with on-the-job training were better counselors than those who had been trained otherwise. This was because the providers encountered a variety of clients on the job, thus honing their counseling skills (68).
Performance ImprovementPerformance improvement goes beyond training to address the institutional, organizational, and managerial factors that affect health care delivery. The performance improvement approach recognizes that achieving better quality of care, including better counseling, is the responsibility of the entire health care system, not just of providers and trainers themselves. Each part of a health care delivery system has a role to play in improving quality (107, 116). In particular, assuring providers enough time to counsel their clients would improve the quality of care they can offer. Most providers have so many duties and so many clients that time for counseling is limited. In Bangladesh, for example, rising demand for the pill reduced the amount of time that field workers had to counsel each woman on proper pill use. The result was that, as more women used the pill, fewer women knew correctly when to begin their next pill pack (123). Removing administrative burdens on providers, such as excessive paperwork, can free up time for counseling. Enabling staff to make improvements in their working environment can increase the quality of care they provide and boost job satisfaction (116). When staff members feel empowered, they often find ways to solve institutional problems rather than to keep working in an unsatisfactory setting (56).
Take-Home InformationAlthough pill manufacturers often produce package inserts for commercially marketed pills, these may be difficult to read and understand for many women (240). Locally produced information and materials can be better because they can be tailored to the clientele. Such inserts can be as simple as an information sheet stapled to the pill packet. In the Dominican Republic studies showing that women often do not take their pills on days when they do not have sex prompted PROFAMILIA, the country's major nongovernmental family planning organization, to develop an information sheet for pill users that emphasizes the need to take the pill daily even when no sexual activity takes place (87). Reinforcing provider's instructions through pill-pack inserts and in other ways helps women use the pill more consistently—provided that women understand these instructions. A study in Western Europe found that women who had read and understood all of the information in the inserts were least likely to miss one or more pills per packet. About 17% of such women reported missing pills. In contrast, among women who understood little or none of the information, about 30% missed one or more pills per packet (182). Providing information on pill use in different ways and in formats that allow later review also influences how effectively women use the pill. In a study in the Netherlands some clients took home either an informational brochure or a brochure together with an audiotape, while others received only the usual counseling. Women who received the most information missed significantly fewer pills during the first several pill cycles than women receiving only the usual counseling (40). A few drugs compromise OC effectiveness (see side-bar, Pill Effectiveness: Unresolved Issues). Take-home information should list these drugs specifically and remind women to use a back-up method or abstain if they are taking any of these medications. Information sheets also should mention that, because severe vomiting and/or diarrhea may diminish the pill's effectiveness, a back-up method of contraception or abstinence may be used for 7 to 14 days in the event of these illnesses.
Following UpClients must know that they can contact a provider at any time and ask any questions, and providers need to ensure that women always feel welcome (85, 175). Providers should welcome any OC user seeking help or advice—whether she initially received supplies from that provider or not. At a follow-up visit providers can reassure women who are experiencing side effects and offer help managing them (see side-bar, Managing Common Side Effects of Combined OCs). If a woman does not want to continue OC use, the provider can help her choose another method. Providers also can assess whether the pill is still medically appropriate for continuing clients. Women often stop using the pill without consulting their providers (3, 168, 180, 227). Indeed, being able to stop the method without seeing a provider is an advantage of OCs. Nonetheless, appropriate follow-up counseling can help potential discontinuers avoid unintended pregnancies by helping them either continue using pills with satisfaction or switch to a more suitable method. Follow-up for providers. Like clients, providers also need continuing attention to maintain their knowledge about OCs. In Gujarat, India, for example, studies during the year following training about the pill found that trainees forgot some of the skills they had learned. In response, newsletters and home study courses were introduced to help maintain accurate knowledge (204). Similarly, in Nepal the weekly radio program for community health workers refreshes listeners' knowledge by presenting information on different contraceptive methods, portraying effective provider-client counseling, and offering quizzes about topics presented in the broadcasts (106).
Keeping Guidelines Up to Date The hormonal content of today's OCs has decreased considerably from that of the first pills, and research has answered many questions about OCs and women's health. Many earlier concerns about pill safety, which had led to various limitations on pill use, have now been satisfied (16). Some family planning programs, however, have not updated their policies, procedures, and training to reflect this new information. Applying up-to-date medical eligibility criteria for OC use, removing unnecessary barriers that restrict access, and overcoming provider bias are particularly important to helping women use the pill.
Medical Eligibility CriteriaUnder the auspices of the World Health Organization (WHO), scientific experts met in 1994, 1995, and March 2000 to make recommendations for updating medical eligibility criteria for major family planning methods based on a review of scientific findings. These criteria help increase access to family planning methods among people who are able to use them safely, while at the same time they help health care providers better identify those who should not use a method for medical reasons. The criteria cover both initiation and continuation of methods, and they can be applied both in settings where clinical judgment is available and where it is limited (244, 245). The WHO guidance has been widely adopted and applied. For example, the checklist for initiation of combined oral contraceptives in community-based programs (see checklist) reflects the latest recommendations of the WHO expert group. Community-based workers can use the checklist to assess whether a client can use OCs without seeing another provider, or whether the client needs to be referred to a provider who can exercise more clinical judgment. The checklist questions cover all the major medical reasons that combined OCs should not usually be used.
Removing Unnecessary BarriersEligibility barriers. Some health care programs or providers require women to meet certain requirements for OCs that have no medical basis. Eligibility criteria related to age and parity, for example, have no medical basis but nevertheless are widespread (81, 200, 222). For example, in a 1992 survey in Pakistan 3 of every 10 family planning providers said that a woman had to be at least 25 years old to use the pill, while 4 of every 10 said women over 35 years could not use the pill (160). In fact, age in itself is not relevant to pill safety. Eligibility criteria and their interpretation need to be broad enough to ensure that women who cannot use the pill safely do not use it but also specific enough that they do not exclude women who can safely use the pill (222). For example, a screening checklist that includes "headache" as a condition that rules out pill use could improperly keep women who have ordinary tension headaches from using the pill (198, 210). Only 1) women who have true migraine headaches with focal neurologic symptoms (aura) and 2) women who have true migraines without aura and are age 35 or older are the focus of concern (245). Unnecessary eligibility barriers have hampered OCs in particular, perhaps because they were the first hormonal contraceptive method. At first, many researchers and practitioners were cautious about providing the pill, concerned that OC use might be bad for women's health or worsen existing medical conditions. Eligibility criteria established many years ago, when hormone levels in the pill were much higher and less was known about effects of the pill, have persisted today in many places, even though subsequent research and experience have proved these limitations to be unnecessary (16). For example, in the US many providers did not prescribe OCs to any woman who is diabetic (198). Research, however, has found no adverse clinical effects among diabetic OC users who have no circulatory system complications (25, 66, 154).
Process barriers. Some service delivery practices make it burdensome for clients to obtain OCs or other contraceptives yet lack scientific justification (198, 199, 209). For OCs, process barriers include unnecessary, inappropriate, or unrelated screening tests or procedures, frequent follow-up requirements, improper management of side effects, failure to give clients enough supplies, and requirements for periods of "rest" from pill use (199). For example, required pelvic exams and laboratory tests for women who choose OCs are a burden to all women seeking OCs and a particular barrier to women who have never before had a pelvic exam or who are afraid of needles (222). In Jamaica a 1993 survey of over 350 private practitioners found that one-quarter performed blood and urine tests on women seeking the pill, even though Jamaican service delivery guidelines make no mention of either test as a prerequisite for pill use (80). In Senegal providers required Pap smears and urine, blood, and sexually transmitted infection tests—all medically unnecessary to safe pill use—before giving clients the pill. In fact, they often did not allow clients to use the pill unless they were in apparently perfect health (81). In Ghana a 1993 Situation Analysis found that 55% of providers required blood hemoglobin tests for prospective OC users, even though such tests are not medically necessary for safe pill use (161). When these unnecessary tests are required, facilities ill-equipped to do such tests cannot provide pills, thus limiting women's access to OCs. While some tests or procedures, such as a pelvic exam, are good preventive health practices that benefit women's overall reproductive health, they nonetheless are not relevant to safe OC use (70, 224). No condition that a pelvic exam might detect rules out OC use (245). Menstrual requirement. Probably the most common process barrier is to deny OCs to new clients unless they are menstruating when they see the provider (2, 60, 209). In Jamaica nearly one-half of private practitioners interviewed would send women home without pills if they were not menstruating. In another Jamaican survey 92% of providers and clinic supervisors said they required menstruation or a negative pregnancy test before they would give women any contraception. In 12 clinics surveyed in Kenya, every provider said that clients are often sent home to await menses. At the same time, over half of the clients visiting 19 Kenyan family planning sites were not menstruating at the time of their clinic visit (209). If women are not actually sent away because they are not menstruating, they may be forced to choose a nonhormonal method instead of the pill. In Cameroon a study of 10 clinics found that only 33% of clients who were not menstruating were given a hormonal method, while 82% of menstruating women left with a hormonal method. Of 21 service providers, only 2 said that they did not require their clients to be menstruating before they would provide OCs (209). The menstrual requirement is meant to ensure that a woman is not pregnant when she starts OCs, for fear that hormones may harm the fetus. This is also why some programs even require a negative pregnancy test before giving OCs. There is no evidence, however, that combined or progestin-only contraceptives harm a fetus (57, 67, 236). WHO medical eligibility criteria were recently changed to make clear that current pregnancy is not a condition relevant to decisions about providing hormonal contraceptives (245). Women who want to start using OCs do not have to do so when they are menstruating: Women can begin using the pill at any time during their menstrual cycle if it is reasonably certain that they are not pregnant (84, 85, 220) (see side-bar, When Can a Woman Start the Pill?). By asking a series of questions, a provider can be reasonably sure that a woman is not pregnant even though she is not menstruating (208, 221). If a woman's answers to these questions cannot affirm that she is not pregnant, a provider can still give her OCs with instructions to start the first packet when menstruation begins and can also provide condoms or spermicides to use until then. Legal and regulatory barriers. In some countries only doctors can legally provide OCs, a requirement that can seriously limit access to the pill, particularly where doctors are few. Such restrictions have no sound medical basis. Not only physicians but also many other personnel, including midwives, nurses, community-based health workers, traditional birth attendants, pharmacists, social marketing vendors, and pharmacy clerks, are safely providing OCs around the world. OCs are made available through door-to-door delivery to people's homes, at community centers, and in shops, markets, and grocery stores (183, 199, 222) (see Chapter 6.2). Unnecessary prescription requirements. In some countries, notably the United Kingdom and the US, OCs are available to women only by prescription. Given the proven safety of low-dose OCs, the widespread demand for the pill, and safe use of OCs among women obtaining them without a prescription throughout the world, some experts argue that OCs should become available without prescription everywhere (30, 69, 167, 224). Making OCs available only by prescription requires women to overcome a series of hurdles to start the pill and to keep using it. First, they must see a physician or other specified health care provider, often endure a pelvic exam, and obtain a prescription for the pill. Then they must go to a pharmacy to have the prescription filled, often for only one pack of pills at a time. Women must continue to return to a pharmacy every month to get another pill pack and return to the doctor every year to have the prescription renewed. Researchers debate the impact that availability of OCs without prescription might have on access, safety, effectiveness, cost, and preventive reproductive health care (28, 39, 69, 70, 79, 92, 167, 187, 189, 224, 249). Eliminating a visit to the doctor—and consequently, the pelvic exam—could increase access to the pill for women who are intimidated by a pelvic exam, cannot afford a provider visit, or are embarrassed to be seen entering a family planning clinic (69, 213, 224). Not seeing a provider for a prescription, however, could also mean that fewer women receive preventive health care screenings such as yearly Pap smears, breast exams, and screening for reproductive tract infections (79). Some are concerned that, without a required visit to a doctor to obtain OCs, women will not heed warnings about health conditions that rule out pill use, such as migraines with aura, high blood pressure, and other circulatory system disorders, and, for women age 35 or older, smoking. They argue that lack of provider intervention would compromise pill users' health, since women who should not use the pill may begin using it if a provider is not there to disallow OC use (79, 213, 249). Studies have shown, however, that giving women accurate information about health conditions and risks helps them correctly assess their own health risks and decide for themselves which methods are most appropriate. In fact, often they can do so as well or better than providers (29, 167, 250). Thus, others argue, women are fully capable of making the right decisions about their health risks. What would offering the pill without a prescription mean for the pill's effectiveness? Some argue that a doctor's or nurse's instructions help women use the pill more effectively (79, 213, 249). Others contend that, given the current gap in pregnancy rates between perfect use and typical use of the pill, clients apparently get too little information from providers as it is. Thus, they reason, using other ways to inform women about how to use the pill may be more effective than continuing current practices (69, 167, 224). In June 2000 the US Food and Drug Administration discussed with scientists, professional groups, and consumers the possibility of changing oral contraceptives from prescription status to being available without a prescription (30, 230).
Provider BiasProviders may incorrectly believe that some groups of women cannot use the pill effectively. For example, in Vietnam providers often do not recommend OCs because they think that clients could not remember to take a pill every day (78). Also, in South Africa women with less education predominantly use injectables, while women with more education mostly use the pill. This difference occurs because providers incorrectly assume that only well-educated women can use the pill consistently and correctly (41, 174). Others may judge clients on the basis of socioeconomic status and treat women of higher status better than those of lower status. In Gujarat, India, for example, a study of OC providers found that they devoted more time to counseling clients of higher social standing (204). Many providers are rude to poor clients, as a study in Bangladesh found (190). Some providers make judgments based on their perception of a specific woman's situation. For example, if providers think that a woman does not want her husband to know about her contraceptive use, they may not offer the pill. They assume that hiding the pill packet would make consistent use too difficult for her (15). Providers' and programs' bias in favor of OCs may actually contribute to ineffective use and early discontinuation among some users. No method is ideal for all users at all times. When providers have preconceived notions that certain clients "should" use OCs, some of their clients will end up with a method that does not suit them well. These clients are not likely to use the pill correctly or for long. Similarly, programs that offer OCs and just one or two other methods leave many women with little choice but to use OCs, whether or not the method suits them.
Improving Access The following can help programs make the pill more affordable, convenient, and accessible:
Better Access to ClinicsFor example, in Thailand a study found that the closer clients lived to a family planning delivery site, the more likely they were to use contraception. Even living a few more minutes away made a considerable difference. For instance, among women who lived less than three minutes from a clinic, 47% were using the pill compared with just 24% among women living six or more minutes away (49). Similarly, in Egypt, pill use fell markedly as travel time to the source of supply increased (108). Having a convenient place to obtain more pills also helps ensure continued use. For example, in Ghana a study of women obtaining pills from a clinic found that nearly half of the pill users who did not return to the clinic for more pills nevertheless kept using the pill. They preferred to buy pills from a more convenient location—often chemists' shops near their homes. Women with a convenient source of supply were over three times as likely to continue OCs over a year-long period and twice as likely to continue using them over a two-year period as women without a convenient source of supply (227). This study suggests that family planning clinics should not assume that clients who do not return for resupply have stopped using the pill. Particularly where pills are accessible in many types of places, many women obtain them from the most convenient source. Thus, even for women who obtain pills initially from clinics, making pills accessible in all kinds of public and commercial locations, including those unrelated to other health care, can help women continue using the pill. Providers can inform clients not only about clinic-based services but also about other sources of pills (151). Giving more pill packets. Giving a woman more than one pill packet at a time reduces the chances that she will run out of pills. In addition, decreasing the number of times a client has to return to a clinic reduces clinic congestion and waiting time. Giving a woman 13 packets—a full year's supply—is ideal if she has no health condition, such as nonvascular diabetes, that needs to be monitored (84, 85). After the first year of pill use, clients can have another year's supply or even an 18-month supply, if expiration dates on the pill packs permit (84, 95). If not enough supplies are on hand to give pill users a full year's supply, women should receive at least three or four packets. Plans for follow-up should leave enough time to obtain more pills well before her supply runs out (84, 111, 180, 235). In the early years of the pill, monthly follow-up was sometimes recommended with higher-dose pills to monitor women closely for any serious side effects. Today's lower-dose pills, however, are safer than ever, and no routine follow-up is needed except for resupply (220). Still, providers often limit how many packets they give out because they think, incorrectly, that they need to monitor the health of pill users (228).
Community-Based DistributionIn some countries CBD is an important component of the national family planning program. In Zimbabwe, for example, where rates of OC use are among the highest in the world, the CBD program serves nearly one family planning client in every four (14). In Bangladesh a study projected that in 1993 family planning use in certain areas would have been only 25%, rather than 40%, if CBD had not been a major component of the country's family planning program (155). CBD is particularly important where there are no health centers or commercial sources of contraception. In 18 villages in Mali where family planning services were not available, for example, only 1% of women used family planning. Six months after a CBD program began in these villages to offer OCs, spermicides, and condoms, contraceptive prevalence had risen to 31% in villages where all three methods were offered and to 21% where spermicides and condoms but not OCs were offered (45).
Regular visits by CBD agents providing supplies and counseling improve OC continuation. In Bangladesh women who had been visited at home by family welfare assistants within the previous 90 days were two-thirds as likely to have discontinued use than women who had not been visited in the last 90 days. The effect of home visits on continuation was strong—and consistent for women of all social and economic backgrounds—even though social marketing outlets and clinics were accessible in the study area (91). Screening clients. Screening clients to identify which women can safely use hormonal methods is an important part of CBD programs. By using checklists, CBD agents can accurately identify women who should not use a method without impeding access for women wanting to start OCs (210) (see checklist). CBD agents also can use a checklist to assure that continuing clients have not developed a medical condition that makes pill use inappropriate. In the Dominican Republic PROFAMILIA's CBD agents use a card to screen potential OC users. By checking off the appropriate color-coded boxes as clients respond to eight yes-or-no questions, the agent decides to:
Community outreach and participation. Community outreach and participation efforts help provide a supportive social setting that makes it easier for women to use the pill correctly and continuously. One example of such participation is monthly meetings in a community member's home or a community center. At such meetings health care providers and members of the community gather together, creating an opportunity for women to talk about family planning, support one another's family planning use, and receive OCs and other contraceptives. This approach has been successful in Bangladesh, where social support was found to be the strongest motivating factor in women's decisions to use and continue using contraception (113, 156). Much of the success of the Indonesian family planning program has also been attributed to community outreach and involvement (217).
Social MarketingSocial marketing is widespread. In 1998, 40 social marketing programs sold nearly 66 million pill packets to women in 34 countries. These numbers are substantially higher than in 1991, when 18 social marketing programs sold about 22 million pill packets in 17 countries (82, 83). Some social marketing programs now operate without subsidy, sustaining themselves wholly from the sales of contraceptives. In Colombia PROFAMILIA's social marketing is completely self-sustained, as are programs in Jamaica and Malaysia. Indonesia's Blue Circle social marketing is largely self-sustaining (83).
Commercial SectorPromoting expansion of the commercial sector improves access to OCs because it offers users more places to obtain pills. Also, when family planning users switch from the public sector to the commercial sector, public funds can go further to improve access for those who cannot afford full price. Government action can stimulate commercial sector growth. For example, placing the pill on a country's list of essential drugs can reduce import barriers, making OCs less expensive. Such changes can make private sector investment in family planning goods and services more feasible economically and more attractive (61). Governments can do much to expand the role of the commercial sector in providing OCs and other contraceptives. Indonesia's government launched the Blue Circle campaign in 1987 both to stimulate demand for private family planning services and to expand the number of private providers. As a result the percentage of family planning users obtaining supplies from the private sector rose from 12% initially to 57% a decade later (23, 24, 99).
Links Between Pill Provision | |||
![]() Claudia Allers, JSI/FPLM | This storeroom in Bolivia demonstrates effective supply management. A range of contraceptives is in stock and well labeled. Logistics management ensures that supplies are always available. |
Side-Bars
When Are Women Most at Risk? Researchers have removed different numbers of pills at different places in the pill pack in an effort to identify how many days without hormonal pills it takes for women to ovulate. Some packets had two, three, or four hormonal pills removed from the third week. Others had hormonal pills removed at the start of the packet: days 1–4, 3–6, or 6–9. These studies involved various low-dose formulations, both multiphasic and monophasic, including those with one of the lowest available doses of ethinyl estradiol, 20 mg. While results varied—from no ovulation to ovulation in 10% of women in one study—in every study women developed ovarian follicles (48, 112, 121, 122, 127, 140, 203, 219). A review of the findings from these studies, coupled with observations about pill-taking and pill failure, suggest several conclusions:
Shortening the Hormone-Free IntervalShortening the hormone-free interval—that is, reducing the number of days a woman does not take hormonal pills to less than seven—may help reduce the risk of breakthrough ovulation if women miss pills immediately before or after the hormone-free interval (216, 252). Such a pill regimen, Minesse®, was approved in Europe in March 2000 and contains 24 hormonal pills and 4 nonhormonal pills (252). This is an ultra-low-dose pill, containing only 15 µg of ethinyl estradiol and 60 µg of gestodene.When compared with a 21-day hormonal pill formulation with 20 µg of ethinyl estradiol and 150 µg of desogestrel, the 24-day hormonal pill pack was just as effective in preventing pregnancy (252). Women using the 24-day hormonal pack had shorter and lighter withdrawal bleeds and more breakthrough bleeding than women using the 21-day hormonal packets. Fewer women discontinued due to breast tenderness or nausea with the 24-day formulation (252). |
Using the "Seven-Day" Guideline |
Most Pill Users' Pregnancies Occur |
![]() Burkina Faso Ministère de la Santé de l'Action Sociale et de la Famille |
Men Can HelpSimilarly, in rural Bangladesh women whose husbands participated in selecting OCs used them longer than women whose husbands were not involved in selecting a family planning method. These women also reported lower rates of discontinuation due to common side effects. Researchers report that husbands helped by urging their wives to obtain more information or counseling from a provider about how to manage side effects. Discussing her side effects with her partner can relieve anxiety. Such discussion also promotes switching to a different method when appropriate (170). When men help in selecting a contraceptive method, they are more likely to be involved in its correct use. A Chinese study looked at the effect of partner involvement on contraceptive use-effectiveness. The pregnancy rate for users of temporary methods was lower among women who attended contraceptive counseling with their husbands than among women who obtained a method on their own (232). Of course, men also can influence their spouses to stop using family planning. Some 37% of women in Bangladesh who had stopped using the pill in less than three months reported that their husbands influenced them to stop (3). Family planning programs can reach men in a variety of ways, especially at places where men gather—for example, at sporting events and community meetings—as well as through mass-media messages (46). Pill use messages in the mass media can speak directly to men and their participation in better reproductive health, including telling them how they can help their partners use the pill effectively. (See Population Reports, New Perspectives on Men's Participation, Series J, No. 46, October 1998.) |
Key Counseling Messages About the Pill
|
Managing Common Side Effects of Combined OCsCommon side effects of pill use typically subside within the first three to six months of use (37, 163, 179). Breakthrough bleeding decreases dramatically over the first four months of pill use (84, 136). How can providers help women with side effects? First, they can urge all OC users to tell them if side effects occur and assure them that usually something can be done to manage side effects. Often, simply letting women know that they can return to consult the provider at any time helps women use a method longer, despite side effects (93, 126). When a pill user returns for help with side effects, the strategies below can help to reduce them. Breakthrough bleeding and spotting. Some women experience breakthrough bleeding or spotting when they miss pills or take them at different times during the day. For these women, taking the pill every day and at the same time can help reduce breakthrough bleeding and spotting. Other women, however, have these side effects even when they take their pills consistently. For women whose breakthrough bleeding occurs early in the pill cycle, changing to a pill with more estrogen, if available, can help reduce bleeding (84, 136). Sometimes switching to another low-dose pill formulation can help. Women with vomiting and diarrhea sometimes ex-perience breakthrough bleeding and spotting (84, 85). Interactions with specific drugs can cause breakthrough bleeding, too (72). Vomiting, diarrhea, and drug interactions affect how the body absorbs the hormones in the pill. Breakthrough bleeding may indicate that the pill is not being fully absorbed, and thus the pill's contraceptive effect may be compromised. These women should continue taking a pill every day, and for added protection they can use a back-up method or avoid intercourse during the period of vomiting, diarrhea, or drug use and for 7 to 14 days afterward (74). Nausea. Feeling nauseous usually passes after the first few months of pill use, usually occurs on the first day or so of the pill pack, and is more common among women who are underweight (73). Taking the pill at night or with food can help reduce nausea, as can consistent pill-taking (84, 85). Weight gain. In most cases, weight change among women using OCs is minimal and not related to pill use: As many women lose weight while taking the pill as gain weight (84). Some women may gain substantially, however. While some women see weight gain as a benefit, others may not be pleased. Reducing the level of estrogen may help keep women from gaining weight (84). Amenorrhea. A small number of pill users stop menstruating when using the pill. More often, a woman's bleeding may be so slight or so brief that she may think she is not bleeding at all. Such apparent or actual amenorrhea can upset women who believe that regular menstruation is necessary to remain healthy or have certain folk beliefs about menstruation (90, 195). Others may be worried that lack of menstruation indicates pregnancy. Asking pill users several questions can help identify what steps can be taken. Is the woman having any bleeding at all? Perhaps she has just a small stain on her underclothes that she has not recognized as bleeding. If this is the case, these women can continue taking their pills every day, with reassurance that not menstruating is not harmful to their health. Although amenorrhea is not usually a sign that a pill user is pregnant, providers can verify whether or not this is case by asking a woman a few questions. For example, in the last month has she taken a pill every day? If so, it is not likely that she is pregnant. She should continue taking her pills every day as usual. Also, some women using 21-day packs may have no bleeding if they start another pill packet immediately rather than waiting seven days between packs. Women who have done this also are not likely to be pregnant. For a woman who has missed two or more hormonal pills in a row, a series of questions can assess whether or not she may be pregnant (see checklist below). A woman must be told if a provider suspects that she may be pregnant. This woman should stop using OCs, and she can use spermicide and condoms until her menstrual period starts or it becomes otherwise clear whether or not she is pregnant. Women who are not pregnant should feel free to start using OCs again if they wish. A few women experience amenorrhea after they stop using the pill. Sometimes it takes women a few months for their periods to return after using OCs. No medical management is needed. Women with irregular menstrual periods before using the pill may have irregular periods again once they stop using the pill (85). Assuring such women that the pill has not affected their fertility can reduce any anxiety about amenorrhea. |
When Can a Woman Start the PillA woman can start the pill at any time that it is reasonably certain that she is not pregnant. She does not have to be menstruating when she starts the pill.A woman who starts the pill more than seven days since menstrual bleeding began should use a back-up method such as condoms or spermicide or else avoid intercourse for the first seven days of taking the pill. Her usual menstrual pattern may change, but she should continue taking all the pills in the pack, regardless of when she next menstruates.
If pregnancy cannot be ruled out—in other words, if the woman cannot answer yes to any of these questions—she can take pills home with her and start them as soon as her menstrual period begins or any time within the first seven days after menstruation starts. When is the best day to start? The first day of menstrual bleeding may be easiest to remember, and starting on the first day requires no counting of days. Recent research, however, suggests that starting later reduces breakthrough bleeding and spotting in the first month. This could be an advantage because breakthrough bleeding is a common reason that women quit OC use in the first month (247, 248). Two studies compared starting on the first day of menstrual bleeding with starting on the fifth day. In the first study 26% of the 50 women starting their pills on the first day of menstruation had breakthrough bleeding compared with 8% of the 50 women starting on the fifth day (248). In a second study 24% of 100 women starting on day 1 and 10% of 100 women starting OCs on day 5 experienced breakthrough bleeding in the first month (247). Because fewer of these women experienced breakthrough bleeding, fewer of the day 5 starters discontinued use during the first pill cycle (247, 248). Some instructions for pill use in some developed countries have told women to start on a Sunday. This guidance has become somewhat less common because many pharmacies in these countries are closed on Sunday, making it difficult for women to obtain pills. |
![]() |
Pill Effectiveness: Unresolved Issues
Drug InteractionsOnly a few drugs are thought to interfere significantly with OC effectiveness (243, 245). Liver enzyme-inducing drugs have been shown to decrease the pill's effectiveness. These include the antibiotic rifampicin, the antifungal griseofulvin, barbiturates, and anticonvulsants carbamazepine, phenytoin, and primadone (12, 32, 34, 44, 125, 172, 202).
Broad-Spectrum AntibioticsA number of small pharmacologic studies evaluating the effect of broad-spectrum antibiotics on OC effectiveness have found no ovulation among OC users taking these drugs. While in some studies ethinyl estradiol concentrations among women decreased, the level of estrogen remained sufficient to prevent pregnancy (11, 35, 42, 64, 130, 142, 145). Drugs studied include ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, fluconazole, ofloxacin, temafloxacin, tetracycline, and triazole.Nevertheless, some pill users who became pregnant report taking antibiotics around the time of conception. For example, 21% of women seeking abortions in New Zealand reported taking antibiotics at this time (207). Based on providers' questioning and assessment, the women in this study are not thought to have missed pills at the time of conception (207). In other studies 4% to as many as 34% of women seeking abortions after OC failure report concurrent antibiotic use, although these studies do not report on other factors that may have played a part in pill failure (47, 255). One reason that concurrent antibiotic use appears to be so common among women experiencing pill failure may be the widespread use of antibiotics: Some women will become pregnant because they missed pills, and, by chance, be using antibiotics at the same time (74). Other women, however, are affected physiologically by antibiotic use. Some pill users' bodies absorb less ethinyl estradiol than others. Such women rely on gut flora to consume the ethinyl estradiol and recirculate it through the small intestine. Broad-spectrum antibiotics, however, remove these flora, leaving no mechanism to redistribute the ethinyl estradiol (10, 201). Some researchers conclude that only these women experience pill failure as a result of using antibiotics (10, 201, 234). Unfortunately, there is no way to identify these women in advance (201). Pill users should not stop taking antibiotics before finishing the full course prescribed to them, even if they are afraid it will make the pill less effective. A growing number of disease organisms are becoming resistant to widely used antibiotics because people are not finishing their full course of antibiotics (257).
Vomiting and DiarrheaIn seven studies of pill users who became pregnant, 19% to 39% reported vomiting, diarrhea, or both in the cycle in which they conceived (47, 207, 253-255, 258, 259). Among abortion-seekers in New Zealand thought not to have missed any pills, 39% reported diarrhea and/or vomiting around the time of conception (207). Similarly, among Danish women experiencing pill failure who had taken all of their pills, 23% reported gastroenteritis around the time of conception (253).Vomiting and diarrhea can interfere with absorption of both estrogen and progestin. Although the hormones in OCs are absorbed in the upper intestinal tract, the increased movement of the intestines during bouts of illness seems to reduce hormonal absorption (63). Many pill users, however, are not aware that vomiting and/or diarrhea may make the pill less effective (19, 47).
What Advice to Give?No consensus exists on how to advise pill users. Some recommendations suggest added protection during these times, while others do not consider it necessary.Among the advice that has been offered are the following:
|



Tables
| Table 1. Oral Contraceptive Discontinuation Rates, 1987–1994 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Country & Year | After One Year | After Two Years | |||
| Ref. No. | All Reasons | Side Effects | All Reasons | Side Effects | |
| Bangladesh 1993–94 | 139 | 45 | 23 | 61 | — |
| Ecuador 1987–88 | 4 | 37 | 19* | 55 | 30* |
| Egypt 1987–88 | 4 | 37 | 19* | 59 | 31* |
| Indonesia 1994 | 58 | 33 | 6 | 47 | — |
| Morocco 1987–88 | 4 | 35 | 14* | 54 | 23* |
| Philippines 1993 | 153 | 39 | 13 | 56 | — |
| Thailand 1987–88 | 4 | 36 | 6* | 50 | 9 |
| Tunisia 1987–88 | 4 | 41 | 23* | 59 | 36* |
| Zimbabwe 1994 | 186 | 15 | 2 | 43 | — |
| *Discontinuing due to health concerns including side effects. | |||||