CONTENTS
Chapters
- Research and Regulatory Approval
- Use of Injectables
- Effectiveness and Reversibility
- Side Effects and Complications
- More Evidence in the Cancer Debate
- Noncontraceptive Health Benefits
- Counseling Issues
- Communicating with the Public
- Maximizing Access and Quality
Published with this issue:
HIGHLIGHTS
Published by the Population Information Program, Center for Communication
Programs, The Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 111 Market Place, Suite 310, Baltimore, Maryland
21202-4012, USA
Volume XXIII, Number 2
August 1995 |
Cervical Cancer
DMPA. The WHO study found no increased risk of invasive cervical
cancer (see Table 6).
There were no trends in risk of invasive cancer by
duration of use or time since first or last use. Researchers controlled
for the sexual behavior of the women and their husbands and for a history
of sexually transmitted diseases, among other variables (303).
The study reported a slightly increased risk of cervical
cancer in situ (cancer confined to the epithelium, the surface
layer of the cervix)—1.25 among women with symptoms
(statistically significant). To avoid screening bias—more
detection of cancer in situ without symptoms among DMPA users
because they were seeing providers more regularly than
nonusers—the researchers emphasize the findings for women who
had symptoms at diagnosis. The researchers conclude from these
findings—increased risk of in situ but not invasive cancer—that
the in situ lesions induced by DMPA may be reversible or that
they do not lead to invasive cancer (304). Other studies of
cervical cancer among DMPA users have found no significant
increased risk of cervical dysplasia (precancerous lesions) (221,
222), cancer in situ, or invasive cancer (227).
Monthly injectables. The only published study devoted
exclusively to monthly injectables concluded that users may have
a slightly increased risk of cervical cancer (relative risk of
1.3). The report, which analyzed data collected in the WHO study,
involved women in Chile and Mexico who had used a monthly
injectable containing dihydroxyprogesterone acetophenide and an
estrogen, usually estradiol enanthate (300).
Endometrial Cancer
Women who use DMPA reduce their risk of endometrial cancer, according to the WHO
study. Thai women using DMPA had a relative risk of 0.2 compared with nonusers
(see Table 6). The
protective effect lasted for more than 12 years after first use and 8 years
after last use. Since only three women with endometrial cancer had used
DMPA, the study could not tell whether risk declined with duration of use.
The protective effect of DMPA may be even stronger than the
WHO study suggests. All three DMPA users who had endometrial
cancer had also taken estrogen to regulate bleeding. Estrogen
increases risk of endometrial cancer (317).
Epethelial Ovarian Cancer
The WHO study found no association between use of DMPA and
epithelial ovarian cancer (291), which accounts for more than 90%
of ovarian cancers (67). The overall relative risk among DMPA
users was 1.1, not statistically significant. The study found no
pattern of risk related to duration of use, time since first or
last use, or age at first use (291).
The failure to find a protective effect is surprising. Like
OCs, DMPA prevents ovulation, which reduces the risk of ovarian
cancer. Thus the injectable should offer similar protection
against ovarian cancer. Women who have ever used OCs have about
two-thirds the risk of ovarian cancer of nonusers, and use for
five years or more cuts the risk of ovarian cancer in half (290).
Liver Cancer
The two studies of liver cancer and injectable
contraceptives, the WHO study and a South African study, report
no increased risk. The WHO study reported results for Kenya and
Thailand, the only countries where DMPA use is high enough to
assess the risk of liver cancer. The relative risk of liver
cancer among Kenyan DMPA users was 1.6, and among Thai users,
0.3. The researchers have more confidence in the Thai data
because most of the cases of liver cancer were confirmed
histologically in Thailand, but only about one-third were
confirmed histologically in Kenya (269). The South African study
found that users of progestin-only injectables had a relative
risk of liver cancer of 0.4, not statistically significant but,
like the Thai data, suggesting a protective effect (159). |